Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 39100 for c's.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 39100 for c's.
State v. Willie E. Willis
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10279 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: EDWIN C. DAHLBERG, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10279 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 806.07(1)(c) and (h).[1] The circuit court denied relief and Hinwood now appeals.[2] ¶3 A circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107969 - 2014-02-10
. §§ 806.07(1)(c) and (h).[1] The circuit court denied relief and Hinwood now appeals.[2] ¶3 A circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107969 - 2014-02-10
CA Blank Order
Courthouse 517 Court Street Neillsville, WI 54456 John C. Bachman John Bachman Law Office P.O. Box 477 Eau
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101901 - 2013-09-17
Courthouse 517 Court Street Neillsville, WI 54456 John C. Bachman John Bachman Law Office P.O. Box 477 Eau
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101901 - 2013-09-17
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter James Nickitas
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
04-10-2007 Affirmed 2006AP002136 CR State v. David C. Fischer
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29389 - 2007-07-11
04-10-2007 Affirmed 2006AP002136 CR State v. David C. Fischer
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29389 - 2007-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, v. Eugene C. Uptgrow, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71379 - 2011-09-26
, v. Eugene C. Uptgrow, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71379 - 2011-09-26
[PDF]
Response Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (Evers)
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T Case No. 2021AP1450-OA BILLIE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefevers2.pdf - 2022-01-03
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T Case No. 2021AP1450-OA BILLIE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respbriefevers2.pdf - 2022-01-03
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Response of Petitioners to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
. ................................................................... 9 B. Wis. Stat. § 806.07 does not apply in this Court. ...................... 10 C. Relief from
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
. ................................................................... 9 B. Wis. Stat. § 806.07 does not apply in this Court. ...................... 10 C. Relief from
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(c) by compounding their late fees, the Roes did not suffer a pecuniary loss. ¶2 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581170 - 2022-10-25
)(c) by compounding their late fees, the Roes did not suffer a pecuniary loss. ¶2 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581170 - 2022-10-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
going to pay for it, but this is not the case that’s being presented to the [c]ourt with someone who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998870 - 2025-08-19
going to pay for it, but this is not the case that’s being presented to the [c]ourt with someone who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998870 - 2025-08-19