Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 49813 for our.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 49813 for our.
Jeffrey Knight v. Milwaukee County
(Ct. App. 1998). Our goal is, of course, “to effectuate the intent of the legislature.” Id., 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2462 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1998). Our goal is, of course, “to effectuate the intent of the legislature.” Id., 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2462 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercise our authority to extend the time for issuing our decision in these appeals. The extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188270 - 2017-09-21
exercise our authority to extend the time for issuing our decision in these appeals. The extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert A. Pond v. Jon E. Litscher
. On March 3, 2000, we consolidated those cases with McKinley’s case on our own motion. 2 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15810 - 2017-09-21
. On March 3, 2000, we consolidated those cases with McKinley’s case on our own motion. 2 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15810 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine McFarland
Counsel, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, guns in our community, felons with guns in our community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17666 - 2017-09-21
Counsel, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, guns in our community, felons with guns in our community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Melvin W. Range, Inc.
irrelevant to our determination. Remittitur to the trial court occurred on June 6, 1995. On June 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10162 - 2017-09-19
irrelevant to our determination. Remittitur to the trial court occurred on June 6, 1995. On June 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10162 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should exercise our discretionary-reversal powers and order a judgment of acquittal. We reject Ross’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654223 - 2023-05-09
should exercise our discretionary-reversal powers and order a judgment of acquittal. We reject Ross’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654223 - 2023-05-09
State v. Thomas G. Kramer
anticipatory invocation of a Miranda right. ¶15 Our holding here, however, is not meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
anticipatory invocation of a Miranda right. ¶15 Our holding here, however, is not meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25442 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Thomas G. Kramer
the non-custodial anticipatory invocation of a Miranda right. ¶15 Our holding here, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25442 - 2017-09-21
the non-custodial anticipatory invocation of a Miranda right. ¶15 Our holding here, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25442 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael F. Howard
, we will begin our analysis with the prejudice prong. A. Prejudice to defendant ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
, we will begin our analysis with the prejudice prong. A. Prejudice to defendant ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry Akins
certified for our review. The first is whether Wis. Stat. § 970.03 (1993-94)[1] denies a defendant equal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16925 - 2005-03-31
certified for our review. The first is whether Wis. Stat. § 970.03 (1993-94)[1] denies a defendant equal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16925 - 2005-03-31