Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 73966 for public records.

State v. Melvin Thompson
Thompson’s right to confidentiality in his medical records under § 146.82, Stats., which constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13044 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Melvin Thompson
in his medical records under § 146.82, STATS., which constituted an alternate and allegedly meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13044 - 2017-09-21

Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
and Glenn L. Cushing, assistant state public defenders, on behalf of the Office of the State Public Defender
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17591 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, but he has not responded. Based upon our independent review of the records and the no- merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240219 - 2019-05-01

[PDF] State v. Vairin M.
of appeals) by Michael Yovovich, assistant state public defender, and Janice Balistreri, deputy first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16485 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of public protection. Michael J. Engebretson pleaded guilty to stalking Kristi H. under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38604 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
motivated as defined in s. 980.01(5)” and if it would be in the interest of public protection. Michael J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38604 - 2009-07-29

[PDF] In Re the Matter of the Final Report of the Wisconsin Courts Covid-19 Task Force
included members of the medical faculty of the UW School of Medicine and Public Health, judges, court
/news/docs/taskforcefinalreport.pdf - 2020-05-22

[PDF] Robert E. Willow v. City of Menomonie
that the public purpose doctrine did not afford Willow relief. The court entered summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5852 - 2017-09-19

Robert E. Willow v. City of Menomonie
classification permits commercial retail use of the property. The court also determined that the public purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5852 - 2005-03-31