Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 63511 for records.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94034 - 2014-09-15

State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
. Stuckey’s driving record is mountainous, and we offer only a summary. Her license was suspended in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31

State v. Fernando R. Salinas
record. We conclude that the court did not do so, and therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20482 - 2005-12-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and response and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174917 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
report. 2 Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141571 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
to the charge, preserving her challenge to the criminal penalties for appeal. Stuckey’s driving record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12850 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184858 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751664 - 2024-01-17

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. In any event, the supplemental order is part of the record on appeal, which counsel could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46516 - 2010-02-01

CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138107 - 2015-03-23