Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 63940 for records.
Search results 8011 - 8020 of 63940 for records.
State v. Dave Burton
that procedural rules were not followed and there was no record that his urine specimen was refrigerated or frozen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
that procedural rules were not followed and there was no record that his urine specimen was refrigerated or frozen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96148 - 2014-09-15
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
they held a status conference without Thomas present. Thomas’s motion said that the “trial court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104555 - 2017-09-21
they held a status conference without Thomas present. Thomas’s motion said that the “trial court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104555 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 48.426(3) on the record. State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 48, ¶35, 237 Wis. 2d 606, 610 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92907 - 2013-02-18
. Stat. § 48.426(3) on the record. State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 48, ¶35, 237 Wis. 2d 606, 610 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92907 - 2013-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the supplemental no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270931 - 2020-07-21
independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the supplemental no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270931 - 2020-07-21
William M. Jacoby v. Jo Ellen Jacoby
affirm because we conclude that the record does demonstrate a substantial change of circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4930 - 2005-03-31
affirm because we conclude that the record does demonstrate a substantial change of circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4930 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104673 - 2013-11-19
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104673 - 2013-11-19
State v. Jonathon L. Norton
in the past and found the same to be reliable. Said record as maintained in the normal and ordinary course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31
in the past and found the same to be reliable. Said record as maintained in the normal and ordinary course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731617 - 2023-11-22
. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731617 - 2023-11-22