Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8021 - 8030 of 64751 for b's.

State v. Teranika H.
. That distinction, however, makes no difference. Here, as in Tawanna H., “[b]ecause the amended charge occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2654 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James L. Allen v. David H. Schwarz
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: PAUL B. HIGGINBOTHAM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8428 - 2017-09-19

State v. James L. Allen
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: MICHAEL B. TORPHY, JR., Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9383 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael L. Murphy
of the nature of the charge and the potential punishment if convicted. (b) Make such inquiry as satisfies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8574 - 2005-03-31

[MS WORD] JD-1784A: Stipulation for Consent Decree (In-Home Placement Only)
to one year.] |_| B. The consent decree shall be amended. The original expiration date
/formdisplay/JD-1784A.doc?formNumber=JD-1784A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-11-08

[PDF] JD-1784A; Stipulation for Consent Decree (In-Home Placement Only)
.] B. The consent decree shall be amended. The original expiration date is . 2
/formdisplay/JD-1784A.pdf?formNumber=JD-1784A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-11-08

[PDF] State v. Jennifer R. Gieck
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b) (2001-02). 1 ¶3 Unlike WIS. STAT. § 340.01(46m), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5430 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Alejandro Aguilera
camp, when in fact he was ineligible due to his age. WIS. STAT. § 302.045(2)(b)(1999-2000) 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3820 - 2017-09-20

Roberta M. Flodin v. Rodney L. Flodin
to division. See Lang v. Lang, 161 Wis.2d 210, 229, 467 N.W.2d 772, 779-80 (1992). Although § 767.255(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8496 - 2005-03-31

97 CV 438J Richard Ahrens v. Town of Fulton
). For purposes of this case, it is important to note that Wis. Stat. § 70.111(19)(b) provides an exemption from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17552 - 2005-03-31