Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8021 - 8030 of 27119 for parenting plan/1000.

[PDF] State v. Kevin S. Meehan
defense objection. ¶5 Meehan presented an alibi defense. He claimed to be home with his parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13461 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Appendix to Brief in Support of Petitioners' Proposed Maps
or designation instead of full names of persons, specifically including juveniles and parents of juveniles
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224appendixbriefinsupport.pdf - 2024-01-12

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Petitioners' Appendix in Support of Remedial Maps
of persons, specifically including juveniles and parents of juveniles, with a notation that the portions
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011224petitionersappendixinsupport.pdf - 2024-01-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
substantially alter the time a parent may spend with his or her child. (b) After 2-year period. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90737 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
about a violation of parental responsibility. It’s about a violation of innocence. ¶3 Alissa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31968 - 2014-09-15

Tommy G. Thompson v. Warner Jackson
, Valerie Barrett, Candice Williams, Senton Williams, Clintrai Giles, Sharon Giles, Parents for School
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17047 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tommy G. Thompson v. Warner Jackson
Giles, Parents for School Choice, Pilar Gonzalez, Dinah Cooley, Julie Vogel, Kate Helsper, Blong Yang
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17047 - 2017-09-21

Michelle Wood v. Phillip J. DeHahn
require the noncustodial parent to act in a manner “consistent” with the legal custodian’s choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11871 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Karen A. Lloyd v. Daniel J. Lloyd
she took to Las Vegas, and Gillitzer’s strained relationship with her parents. Gillitzer admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. It’s about a violation of trust. It’s about a violation of parental responsibility. It’s about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27