Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8021 - 8030 of 63956 for records.

State v. Michael G.
is whether the trial court erred by transferring custody because the record contained insufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8708 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184858 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Sveum
were procedurally barred and that the record conclusively demonstrates that no relief was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15993 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Novotney was sent a copy of the report, and has filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242959 - 2019-06-27

State v. Dave Burton
that procedural rules were not followed and there was no record that his urine specimen was refrigerated or frozen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10965 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96148 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
they held a status conference without Thomas present. Thomas’s motion said that the “trial court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104555 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13

COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 48.426(3) on the record. State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 48, ¶35, 237 Wis. 2d 606, 610 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92907 - 2013-02-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report, and the supplemental no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270931 - 2020-07-21