Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8031 - 8040 of 12460 for mr.
Search results 8031 - 8040 of 12460 for mr.
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Rushing
. Rushing's brief argues, "[N]o reasonable trier of fact could have found Mr. Rushing guilty based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8736 - 2017-09-19
. Rushing's brief argues, "[N]o reasonable trier of fact could have found Mr. Rushing guilty based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8736 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Mr. Towns told Investigator Robert Walensky that he represented Ms. Cole, and that she was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108412 - 2014-02-26
. Mr. Towns told Investigator Robert Walensky that he represented Ms. Cole, and that she was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108412 - 2014-02-26
[PDF]
Grant W. LaPlant v. Pierro Hamse Wipperfurth
which the court did not answer: Mr. Wipperfurth: … [T]hat’s correct that I don’t [have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15232 - 2017-09-21
which the court did not answer: Mr. Wipperfurth: … [T]hat’s correct that I don’t [have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 47
officials, two, any evidence that the City or its officials conspired with anyone to include Mr. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35971 - 2014-09-15
officials, two, any evidence that the City or its officials conspired with anyone to include Mr. Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35971 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert A. Rushing
have found Mr. Rushing guilty based upon the alleged victim finding his penis wet and deducing that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8736 - 2005-03-31
have found Mr. Rushing guilty based upon the alleged victim finding his penis wet and deducing that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the additional witnesses “was not necessarily consistent with each other, in terms of where exactly Mr. Spencer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239115 - 2019-04-16
of the additional witnesses “was not necessarily consistent with each other, in terms of where exactly Mr. Spencer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239115 - 2019-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Chaunte Ott
concessions the State had made “to get Mr. Hadaway to say that Mr. Ott committed this crime.” To rebut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21
concessions the State had made “to get Mr. Hadaway to say that Mr. Ott committed this crime.” To rebut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 59
at sentencing, Mr. Armstrong was entitled to about 8 months, not 2 years, of credit. Therefore, the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110178 - 2017-09-21
at sentencing, Mr. Armstrong was entitled to about 8 months, not 2 years, of credit. Therefore, the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was “potentially a stall tactic on the part of Mr. Hungerford and an effort to not accept responsibility for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246554 - 2019-09-12
was “potentially a stall tactic on the part of Mr. Hungerford and an effort to not accept responsibility for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246554 - 2019-09-12
State v. Eddie Lee Quinn
denied Quinn’s motion for an evidentiary hearing. It concluded: The issues raised by Mr. Quinn fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3302 - 2005-03-31
denied Quinn’s motion for an evidentiary hearing. It concluded: The issues raised by Mr. Quinn fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3302 - 2005-03-31