Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8031 - 8040 of 58618 for speedy trial.
Search results 8031 - 8040 of 58618 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. She argues that this court should vacate her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193617 - 2017-09-21
was remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing. She argues that this court should vacate her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193617 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Henry T. Skibinski
Skibinski claims the trial court erred when it interpreted the penalty statutes found in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2592 - 2017-09-19
Skibinski claims the trial court erred when it interpreted the penalty statutes found in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2592 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven W. Brycki
concentration, see Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b), and from the trial court’s order revoking his privilege to drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3191 - 2005-03-31
concentration, see Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b), and from the trial court’s order revoking his privilege to drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3191 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Jenkins had alleged that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91549 - 2013-01-14
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Jenkins had alleged that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91549 - 2013-01-14
State v. Ernest E. Burton
. § 939.62 (1999‑2000).[1] Burton also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3479 - 2005-03-31
. § 939.62 (1999‑2000).[1] Burton also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3479 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodney G. Zivcic
four issues: (1) whether he is entitled to a new trial based on our supreme court’s decision in State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14019 - 2005-03-31
four issues: (1) whether he is entitled to a new trial based on our supreme court’s decision in State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14019 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry T. Skibinski
. § 346.63(1) (1997-98).[1] Skibinski claims the trial court erred when it interpreted the penalty statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2591 - 2005-03-31
. § 346.63(1) (1997-98).[1] Skibinski claims the trial court erred when it interpreted the penalty statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2591 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kelly Diestler v. Thomas J. Juza Custom Home & Design, Inc.
The Diestlers argue that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it vacated a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5975 - 2017-09-19
The Diestlers argue that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it vacated a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5975 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Henry T. Skibinski
Skibinski claims the trial court erred when it interpreted the penalty statutes found in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2591 - 2017-09-19
Skibinski claims the trial court erred when it interpreted the penalty statutes found in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2591 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). First, Donald claims the trial court erred when it did not submit jury instructions and two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77429 - 2014-09-15
). First, Donald claims the trial court erred when it did not submit jury instructions and two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77429 - 2014-09-15