Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8041 - 8050 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 8041 - 8050 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
Janet M. Evans v. Timothy D. Heitman, M.D.
for perfecting the judgment had expired, Dr. Heitman filed a motion to extend the time within which to perfect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14112 - 2014-09-15
for perfecting the judgment had expired, Dr. Heitman filed a motion to extend the time within which to perfect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]he ten-day time limit is a mandatory requirement that may not be extended due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
that “[t]he ten-day time limit is a mandatory requirement that may not be extended due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Maureen B. Fitzgerald
to extend the applicable statute of limitations, when that information was not true. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25393 - 2017-09-21
to extend the applicable statute of limitations, when that information was not true. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25393 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision. Defense counsel also informed Taylor that the State’s witnesses, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272858 - 2020-07-28
’ extended supervision. Defense counsel also informed Taylor that the State’s witnesses, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272858 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Angel E.
and services was entered in September 1991. That order was extended in September 1992, September 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9886 - 2017-09-19
and services was entered in September 1991. That order was extended in September 1992, September 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9886 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Angel E.
and services was entered in September 1991. That order was extended in September 1992, September 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9885 - 2017-09-19
and services was entered in September 1991. That order was extended in September 1992, September 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9885 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Reno D. Coffin
of extended supervision. On November 20, 2003, Coffin, by new counsel, Michael Zell, filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7298 - 2017-09-20
of extended supervision. On November 20, 2003, Coffin, by new counsel, Michael Zell, filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7298 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to twelve years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision concurrent with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
to twelve years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision concurrent with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
State v. Jeremiah C.
eighteen. Logically, then, a JIPS order based solely on habitual truancy cannot extend past the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31
eighteen. Logically, then, a JIPS order based solely on habitual truancy cannot extend past the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and three years of extended supervision. ¶5 McLean challenged the sentence in postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73393 - 2014-09-15
confinement and three years of extended supervision. ¶5 McLean challenged the sentence in postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73393 - 2014-09-15