Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8041 - 8050 of 12462 for mr.
Search results 8041 - 8050 of 12462 for mr.
[PDF]
State v. Brian S. Kortbein
then specifically asked Mr. Kortbein—Or told him that we had physical evidence that could put him in the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14086 - 2014-09-15
then specifically asked Mr. Kortbein—Or told him that we had physical evidence that could put him in the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Mr. Alexander.” After reviewing his records, which were entered as an exhibit at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
to Mr. Alexander.” After reviewing his records, which were entered as an exhibit at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, As regards to parenting, Jeff and Karen Soronen have very different styles. Mr. Soronen is more rigid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82187 - 2014-09-15
, As regards to parenting, Jeff and Karen Soronen have very different styles. Mr. Soronen is more rigid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82187 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Anthony Kish v. Health Personnel Options Corporation
did not hear what Mr. Kiefer said.” Later, Kish was asked: Q. Was it your understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13001 - 2017-09-21
did not hear what Mr. Kiefer said.” Later, Kish was asked: Q. Was it your understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, that it is prejudicial, and that “[i]f [he] had known about it, maybe [he] wouldn’t have had Mr. Carolina testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498468 - 2022-03-22
, that it is prejudicial, and that “[i]f [he] had known about it, maybe [he] wouldn’t have had Mr. Carolina testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498468 - 2022-03-22
State v. Cesar Farias-Mendoza
interrogation of Mr. Farias-Mendoza.” His motion alleged that his illegal arrest tainted all of his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25380 - 2006-07-25
interrogation of Mr. Farias-Mendoza.” His motion alleged that his illegal arrest tainted all of his statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25380 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Myren
be. .... THE COURT: [Mr. Myren’s attorney]? [DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY]: Judge, that was Judge Mulroy’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3121 - 2017-09-20
be. .... THE COURT: [Mr. Myren’s attorney]? [DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY]: Judge, that was Judge Mulroy’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3121 - 2017-09-20
State v. Eddie Lee Quinn
denied Quinn’s motion for an evidentiary hearing. It concluded: The issues raised by Mr. Quinn fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3302 - 2005-03-31
denied Quinn’s motion for an evidentiary hearing. It concluded: The issues raised by Mr. Quinn fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 59
at sentencing, Mr. Armstrong was entitled to about 8 months, not 2 years, of credit. Therefore, the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110178 - 2017-09-21
at sentencing, Mr. Armstrong was entitled to about 8 months, not 2 years, of credit. Therefore, the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not in any way involve either (1) Mr. Hawthorne having a gun[,] real or fake, or (2) the victim perceiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82323 - 2014-09-15
not in any way involve either (1) Mr. Hawthorne having a gun[,] real or fake, or (2) the victim perceiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82323 - 2014-09-15