Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8051 - 8060 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 8051 - 8060 of 24568 for extending.
CA Blank Order
for sentencing. The State recommended fifteen months’ initial confinement and twenty-four months’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97263 - 2013-05-20
for sentencing. The State recommended fifteen months’ initial confinement and twenty-four months’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97263 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]he ten-day time limit is a mandatory requirement that may not be extended due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
that “[t]he ten-day time limit is a mandatory requirement that may not be extended due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The court then sentenced Jousha to two years of initial confinement and three years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104355 - 2017-09-21
The court then sentenced Jousha to two years of initial confinement and three years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104355 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a total of twelve years in prison and ten years of extended supervision. The court sentenced Rodriguez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104668 - 2013-11-18
a total of twelve years in prison and ten years of extended supervision. The court sentenced Rodriguez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104668 - 2013-11-18
CA Blank Order
to twenty years of initial confinement and thirteen years and nine months of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145687 - 2015-07-30
to twenty years of initial confinement and thirteen years and nine months of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145687 - 2015-07-30
State v. Katie H.
eighteen. Logically, then, a JIPS order based solely on habitual truancy cannot extend past the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5601 - 2005-03-31
eighteen. Logically, then, a JIPS order based solely on habitual truancy cannot extend past the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5601 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court imposed a sentence of five years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131361 - 2017-09-21
. The court imposed a sentence of five years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
terms followed by fifteen years’ extended supervision, for a total of twenty-one years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
terms followed by fifteen years’ extended supervision, for a total of twenty-one years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 13
in Colorado, the practical effect of a reinstatement requirement in Wisconsin would be to extend Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47448 - 2014-09-15
in Colorado, the practical effect of a reinstatement requirement in Wisconsin would be to extend Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47448 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Angel E.
and services was entered in September 1991. That order was extended in September 1992, September 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9885 - 2017-09-19
and services was entered in September 1991. That order was extended in September 1992, September 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9885 - 2017-09-19