Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 80561 - 80570 of 82545 for simple case.
Search results 80561 - 80570 of 82545 for simple case.
State v. Fitzroy Donaldson
for a preliminary hearing,[1] and because he did not advise Donaldson of the nature of the case, the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13410 - 2005-03-31
for a preliminary hearing,[1] and because he did not advise Donaldson of the nature of the case, the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13410 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in cases discussing whether a detention has become an arrest because it is unreasonably long. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50202 - 2010-05-19
in cases discussing whether a detention has become an arrest because it is unreasonably long. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50202 - 2010-05-19
[PDF]
George M. DeBruin v. Town of Ashippun Board of Review
discussed in Rosen and similar cases. But, as we have discussed above, Franke testified before the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11776 - 2017-09-20
discussed in Rosen and similar cases. But, as we have discussed above, Franke testified before the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11776 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
charges were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. A misdemeanor charge in another case was dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95390 - 2013-04-16
charges were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. A misdemeanor charge in another case was dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95390 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Gary O. McKenzie
) that at the time of the plea, the defendant was unaware of the potential constitutional challenge to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
) that at the time of the plea, the defendant was unaware of the potential constitutional challenge to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank Starich
charge in this case. It did not result in a separate conviction and it plays no part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3041 - 2017-09-19
charge in this case. It did not result in a separate conviction and it plays no part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3041 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Susette Hanlon v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
of the relevant disability law to the facts of her case. The Board argues that we should apply the due weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6755 - 2017-09-20
of the relevant disability law to the facts of her case. The Board argues that we should apply the due weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6755 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP117-CRNM 3 493, 507, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990)). With respect to the OWI charge in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208833 - 2018-02-21
. No. 2017AP117-CRNM 3 493, 507, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990)). With respect to the OWI charge in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208833 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
early in the case, after his trial counsel raised concerns about Youngblood’s mental health
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858751 - 2024-10-08
early in the case, after his trial counsel raised concerns about Youngblood’s mental health
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858751 - 2024-10-08
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. American Colloid Company
or establish a manifest error of law or fact.” Id., ¶44. A motion for reconsideration “cannot in any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25218 - 2006-05-23
or establish a manifest error of law or fact.” Id., ¶44. A motion for reconsideration “cannot in any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25218 - 2006-05-23