Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16002 - 2017-09-21
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16001 - 2017-09-21
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16004 - 2017-09-21
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16003 - 2017-09-21
had not contained the statutorily required parental TPR warning. The court denied this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
. STAT. RULE 809.30. A motion is timely under § 974.06 so long as the defendant is still in custody.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. RULE 809.30. A motion is timely under § 974.06 so long as the defendant is still in custody.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
were in custody when the motion hearing was held. ¶8 The trial court issued its decision from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27844 - 2007-01-22
were in custody when the motion hearing was held. ¶8 The trial court issued its decision from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27844 - 2007-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and neglect of a child and from an order denying her postconviction motion. Her appellate counsel has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20
and neglect of a child and from an order denying her postconviction motion. Her appellate counsel has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
witnesses were in custody when the motion hearing was held. ¶8 The trial court issued its decision from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27844 - 2014-09-15
witnesses were in custody when the motion hearing was held. ¶8 The trial court issued its decision from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27844 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ motion to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. Shilts does not argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737100 - 2023-12-05
’ motion to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. Shilts does not argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737100 - 2023-12-05
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
existed at the time Dumas was taken into custody and searched, and that the record contains sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
existed at the time Dumas was taken into custody and searched, and that the record contains sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31