Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 82869 for case search.

State v. David Vigil
into the alley to search for the alleged puddle of urine. In the end, the search did not reveal a puddle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7436 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 263
2006 WI APP 263 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27272 - 2014-09-15

State v. David Vigil
into the alley to search for the alleged puddle of urine. In the end, the search did not reveal a puddle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7435 - 2005-03-31

Dolores J. Rindahl v. Ralph G. Rindahl
reasoned: What [Dolores] in this case is doing is asking this court to interpret the Illinois judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10709 - 2005-03-31

2006 WI APP 263
2006 WI App 263 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP283-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27272 - 2006-12-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, a search warrant City of Burlington police officers executed at Williams’ residence yielded a quantity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50883 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
petition to return $1,150 seized by police during a search of LaPere’s property.[1] Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62135 - 2011-04-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the search warrant used by police in the case; and (4) whether the sentence credit listed on the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473641 - 2022-01-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 2 We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228847 - 2018-11-29

[PDF] NOTICE
implicitly denying his petition to return $1,150 seized by police during a search of LaPere’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62135 - 2014-09-15