Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 41752 for new88v.net ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new 88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88vnet ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน nha cai new88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88v.net.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of a new factor. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ยถ2 Miskowski pled guilty to one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108113 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that there is a new factor that entitles him to be resentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for sentence modification, arguing that a change in law constitutes a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87625 - 2012-10-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, arguing that a change in law constitutes a new factor justifying modification. Schmidt also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87625 - 2014-09-15

State v. Scott C. Harty
of his motion for modification of sentence on the basis of โ€œnew factorsโ€ or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15588 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Training resources News For the media Headlines The Third Branch Media coordinators Media resources
/news/thirdbranch/aug25/njo.htm - 2026-05-14

State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
that there is a new factor that entitles him to be resentenced, that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18201 - 2005-05-17

State v. Daniel Williams
which entitles a party to a new trial under s. 805.15(3)[.] Evidence is considered newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2980 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 66
offenders committing another offense. Under the new scoring system, Richard alleges that he would score
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63115 - 2014-09-15

State v. Bernard E. Burgess
modification or a new sentencing hearing because the court: (1) failed to consider and/or correct errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31