Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 84321 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 84321 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
the plastic bag. A subsequent inventory search of the bag disclosed two handguns, substantial quantities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7708 - 2017-09-19
the plastic bag. A subsequent inventory search of the bag disclosed two handguns, substantial quantities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7708 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
position “in case there was a struggle or a fight.” ¶7 The bedroom was open, and Brooks stepped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31
position “in case there was a struggle or a fight.” ¶7 The bedroom was open, and Brooks stepped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
the plastic bag. A subsequent inventory search of the bag disclosed two handguns, substantial quantities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7708 - 2005-03-31
the plastic bag. A subsequent inventory search of the bag disclosed two handguns, substantial quantities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7708 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34883 - 2008-12-15
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34883 - 2008-12-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34883 - 2014-09-15
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Denzil R. Crosby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Denzil R. Crosby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Denzil R. Crosby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Denzil R. Crosby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Jones
-shirt—seized from his vehicle. Because the traffic stop was valid and Jones consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
-shirt—seized from his vehicle. Because the traffic stop was valid and Jones consented to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles E. Jones
his vehicle. Because the traffic stop was valid and Jones consented to the search, this court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18740 - 2005-06-27
his vehicle. Because the traffic stop was valid and Jones consented to the search, this court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18740 - 2005-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Sheldon C. Stank
and gunfire when executing search warrants in narcotics cases. Id. The court held the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20051 - 2017-09-21
and gunfire when executing search warrants in narcotics cases. Id. The court held the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20051 - 2017-09-21