Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 58618 for speedy trial.
Search results 8071 - 8080 of 58618 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Chaney contends that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35500 - 2009-02-09
, Chaney contends that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35500 - 2009-02-09
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
divorce judgment ordering property division and child support. He argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
divorce judgment ordering property division and child support. He argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7402 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
of his divorce judgment ordering property division and child support. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
of his divorce judgment ordering property division and child support. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Dane County v. James S.
) whether the trial court erred when it “found the facts supporting termination” despite James’s request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13914 - 2014-09-15
) whether the trial court erred when it “found the facts supporting termination” despite James’s request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13914 - 2014-09-15
Dane County v. James S.
. He raises the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred when it “found the facts supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13914 - 2005-03-31
. He raises the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred when it “found the facts supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Root v. John T. Saul
, as he did in a post-verdict motion, that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24982 - 2017-09-21
, as he did in a post-verdict motion, that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24982 - 2017-09-21
James Root v. John T. Saul
, that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice and based on the following errors: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24982 - 2006-06-27
, that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice and based on the following errors: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24982 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
A. Franke presided over this matter through trial and the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Elsa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28487 - 2014-09-15
A. Franke presided over this matter through trial and the judgment of conviction. The Honorable Elsa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28487 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
of conviction and remanded the matter for a new trial. Anthony Hicks (Hicks) was convicted of one count
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16942 - 2005-03-31
of conviction and remanded the matter for a new trial. Anthony Hicks (Hicks) was convicted of one count
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16942 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Lozornio appeals the judgment of conviction for three counts of sexual assault of a child and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414602 - 2021-08-24
Lozornio appeals the judgment of conviction for three counts of sexual assault of a child and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414602 - 2021-08-24