Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 68445 for did.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 68445 for did.
Fred Carlson v. Trailer Equipment and Supply, Inc.
that there was no issue of fact concerning strict liability and that strict liability did not apply to Trailer Equipment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14496 - 2005-03-31
that there was no issue of fact concerning strict liability and that strict liability did not apply to Trailer Equipment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14496 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chad Everts
but affirm the order on the grounds that the trial court’s finding that Rusch did not intentionally provoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3758 - 2005-03-31
but affirm the order on the grounds that the trial court’s finding that Rusch did not intentionally provoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3758 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing claim, the court’s sentence was individualized and its comments on the efficacy of the SAP did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20
sentencing claim, the court’s sentence was individualized and its comments on the efficacy of the SAP did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that he did not intend to rape the victim, as well as a police report recounting that “George” told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29707 - 2007-07-16
that he did not intend to rape the victim, as well as a police report recounting that “George” told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29707 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Darryl Joe Brown
warrant. Here, the court did not determine whether the police had probable cause. Furthermore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4666 - 2017-09-19
warrant. Here, the court did not determine whether the police had probable cause. Furthermore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4666 - 2017-09-19
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
the Accused” document. Wagner agreed to submit to a blood test. The officer testified that “Wagner did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5354 - 2005-03-31
the Accused” document. Wagner agreed to submit to a blood test. The officer testified that “Wagner did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5354 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Charlie talked to him. Keck testified that he did not focus on impeaching Charles, however, because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45233 - 2010-01-05
Charlie talked to him. Keck testified that he did not focus on impeaching Charles, however, because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45233 - 2010-01-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
said he was not sure of the clock’s accuracy. On cross-examination, Officer Miller said he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60799 - 2014-09-15
said he was not sure of the clock’s accuracy. On cross-examination, Officer Miller said he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60799 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, then conducted a substantial cross- examination. During the course of that cross-examination, F.P. said she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
, then conducted a substantial cross- examination. During the course of that cross-examination, F.P. said she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
instruction on privilege because the evidence at trial did not support a privilege defense under Coleman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690600 - 2023-08-15
instruction on privilege because the evidence at trial did not support a privilege defense under Coleman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690600 - 2023-08-15