Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 17640 for ex.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 17640 for ex.
COURT OF APPEALS
raised on direct appeal was not. State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681-82, 556 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68656 - 2011-08-01
raised on direct appeal was not. State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681-82, 556 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68656 - 2011-08-01
CA Blank Order
. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1]; see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex rel. McCoy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121563 - 2014-09-08
. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1]; see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex rel. McCoy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121563 - 2014-09-08
CA Blank Order
rule that requires a statement explaining why the appeal lacks merit. See State ex rel. McCoy v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28
rule that requires a statement explaining why the appeal lacks merit. See State ex rel. McCoy v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. LEONARD COLLINS, SR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61891 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. LEONARD COLLINS, SR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
discretion by applying Escalona-Naranjo retroactively in violation of the prohibition on ex post facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959253 - 2025-05-21
discretion by applying Escalona-Naranjo retroactively in violation of the prohibition on ex post facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959253 - 2025-05-21
State v. Edward D. Werchowski
of regularity. State ex rel. LaFollette v. Circuit Court, 37 Wis.2d 329, 344, 155 N.W.2d 141, 149 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9992 - 2005-03-31
of regularity. State ex rel. LaFollette v. Circuit Court, 37 Wis.2d 329, 344, 155 N.W.2d 141, 149 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9992 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Rules 809.107(5m) and 809.32[1]; Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); and State ex rel. McCoy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104309 - 2013-11-11
. Rules 809.107(5m) and 809.32[1]; Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); and State ex rel. McCoy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104309 - 2013-11-11
[PDF]
State v. Brian T. Vadnais
to require further proceedings, in the absence of other, new exculpatory evidence. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8892 - 2017-09-19
to require further proceedings, in the absence of other, new exculpatory evidence. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8892 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
which could have been raised on direct appeal was not. See [State ex rel.] Rothering [v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26787 - 2014-09-15
which could have been raised on direct appeal was not. See [State ex rel.] Rothering [v. McCaughtry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26787 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: 2018AP630 State of Wisconsin ex rel. Michael A. Sveum v. Tim Haines (L.C. # 2017CV1309) Before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228790 - 2018-11-28
: 2018AP630 State of Wisconsin ex rel. Michael A. Sveum v. Tim Haines (L.C. # 2017CV1309) Before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228790 - 2018-11-28