Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 15593 for fee.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 15593 for fee.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of an eight-inch one and paid the difference out of impact fees imposed in 1995. The special assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33969 - 2014-09-15
of an eight-inch one and paid the difference out of impact fees imposed in 1995. The special assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33969 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jens O. Luebow v. Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
of fees and costs. It held “that Dr. Luebow has not met his burden of showing that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3660 - 2017-09-19
of fees and costs. It held “that Dr. Luebow has not met his burden of showing that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3660 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for the minor child’s variable expenses. Dietzen and Anderson both move for sanctions, costs, and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133045 - 2015-01-20
for the minor child’s variable expenses. Dietzen and Anderson both move for sanctions, costs, and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133045 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
James L. Gratz v. Harold E. Gratz
equally unto my said widow and daughter absolutely and forever, in fee simple absolute. And if my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10803 - 2017-09-20
equally unto my said widow and daughter absolutely and forever, in fee simple absolute. And if my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10803 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of $28,020.37 plus interest accrued, costs, and attorney fees. Angotti counterclaimed for the $8,000 it paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307658 - 2020-11-24
of $28,020.37 plus interest accrued, costs, and attorney fees. Angotti counterclaimed for the $8,000 it paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307658 - 2020-11-24
Elaine A. Ray v. Town of Kinnickinnic
their education and it brought about their compliance somewhat, could I have fees and costs awarded to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7651 - 2005-03-31
their education and it brought about their compliance somewhat, could I have fees and costs awarded to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 1 (“In order to be awarded costs, fees, and reasonable attorney fees, the moving party must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 1 (“In order to be awarded costs, fees, and reasonable attorney fees, the moving party must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elaine A. Ray v. Town of Kinnickinnic
their compliance somewhat, could I have fees and costs awarded to me?” (Emphasis added.) A discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7651 - 2017-09-19
their compliance somewhat, could I have fees and costs awarded to me?” (Emphasis added.) A discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7651 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of such pecuniary loss, together with costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.” (Emphasis added). “Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
of such pecuniary loss, together with costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.” (Emphasis added). “Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20
Jens O. Luebow v. Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
found that Luebow’s brief was inadequate with respect to all issues except the imposition of fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3660 - 2005-03-31
found that Luebow’s brief was inadequate with respect to all issues except the imposition of fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3660 - 2005-03-31