Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 18781 for quote.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 18781 for quote.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(quoted source omitted). ¶10 Circuit court findings of historical or evidentiary fact, including those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149931 - 2017-09-21
(quoted source omitted). ¶10 Circuit court findings of historical or evidentiary fact, including those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149931 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that was considered by an expert testifying in a prior proceeding.” Id., ¶39 (quoting State v. Combs, 2006 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129031 - 2017-09-21
that was considered by an expert testifying in a prior proceeding.” Id., ¶39 (quoting State v. Combs, 2006 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129031 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, it is ‘virtually unassailable’ and the ineffective assistance claim fails.” (quoted sources omitted)). Nor can
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
, it is ‘virtually unassailable’ and the ineffective assistance claim fails.” (quoted sources omitted)). Nor can
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶16 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984)). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶16 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984)). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶20, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103693 - 2013-10-30
preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶20, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103693 - 2013-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶30, 289 Wis. 2d 34, 52, 710 N.W.2d 466, 476 (quoting McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d at 276–277, 182 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
, ¶30, 289 Wis. 2d 34, 52, 710 N.W.2d 466, 476 (quoting McCleary, 49 Wis. 2d at 276–277, 182 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
” is applied when “the agency interpretation is ‘very nearly’ one of first impression,” ibid. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
” is applied when “the agency interpretation is ‘very nearly’ one of first impression,” ibid. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tara S.
by the record. As quoted, the court repeatedly referred to Tara’s and the children’s current circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5932 - 2017-09-19
by the record. As quoted, the court repeatedly referred to Tara’s and the children’s current circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5932 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to correct it. However, the brief does not quote or describe any such policy. Instead, it merely directs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541373 - 2022-07-08
to correct it. However, the brief does not quote or describe any such policy. Instead, it merely directs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541373 - 2022-07-08
CA Blank Order
.2d 507 (quoted source omitted). Finally, there is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125417 - 2014-10-27
.2d 507 (quoted source omitted). Finally, there is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125417 - 2014-10-27