Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 18714 for quote.

State v. Craig A. Zempel
. See, e.g., State v. Olson, 75 Wis.2d 575, 581, 250 N.W.2d 12, 15-16 (1977) (quoting State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31

Donald Floerchinger v. Nestle Transportation
241 (Ct. App. 1995) (quoting Applied Plastics, Inc. v. LIRC, 121 Wis. 2d 271, 276, 359 N.W.2d 168, 171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5156 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Craig A. Zempel
.2d 575, 581, 250 N.W.2d 12, 15-16 (1977) (quoting State ex rel. Evanow v. Seraphim, 40 Wis.2d 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14285 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Timmerman, 198 Wis. 2d 309, 316-17, 542 N.W.2d 221 (Ct. App. 1995) (quoting Black’s Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28936 - 2007-05-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, it is ‘virtually unassailable’ and the ineffective assistance claim fails.” (quoted sources omitted)). Nor can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09

COURT OF APPEALS
, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.” Id. (quoting another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a crime. Id. at 56 (quoting State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663, 675, 407 N.W.2d 548 (1987)). What
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28123 - 2007-02-12

WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1582-CR Complete Title...
of its meaning.’” Id. (quoting Bruno v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2003 WI 28, ¶20, 260 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96064 - 2013-05-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.’” State v. Hampton, 2004 WI 107, ¶60, 274 Wis. 2d 379, 683 N.W.2d 14 (quoting State v. Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28

Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
(quoted source omitted). Under this test, a party bringing an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31