Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8091 - 8100 of 10311 for jr.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
: CHARLES F. KAHN, JR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09

[PDF] Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
, and later, Detective Leroy Nennig, Jr., obtained a search warrant for Oney's home based, in part, upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8386 - 2017-09-19

Paul Boemer v. Mary Lu Davis
- Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: david v. jennings, JR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11641 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevin Giebel
On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of R. Scott Miller, Jr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8050 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Burke, Jr. The preliminary hearing in both cases was scheduled for February 3, 2010. At the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109409 - 2014-03-24

State v. Vernon D. Fields
to Fields, the information named as defendants Wilfredo Vasquez, Jr., Bernardo Hernandez and Andrew Acosta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3916 - 2005-03-31

State v. James L. Kurtz
. zappen, jr., Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20149 - 2005-11-09

[PDF] State v. Michael Evans
County: LAURENCE C. GRAM, JR., and JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judges. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2677 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kip D. Erickson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Williamson, Jr., Appleton. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent-respondent Labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19152 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Caterpillar, Inc.
to the decision of an administrative agency is due to the commission, not to the DOR. William Wrigley, Jr., Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2211 - 2017-09-19