Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 811 - 820 of 9546 for jurors.
Search results 811 - 820 of 9546 for jurors.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the parties an appropriate response, it received word from the jury foreperson that another juror had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909275 - 2025-02-05
with the parties an appropriate response, it received word from the jury foreperson that another juror had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909275 - 2025-02-05
State v. Audrey A. Edmunds
of the child’s parents’ demeanors, a juror excused during the trial, and a jury instruction. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14327 - 2005-03-31
of the child’s parents’ demeanors, a juror excused during the trial, and a jury instruction. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14327 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mario V. Whitney
to a jury trial; (4) the trial court erred by not removing two jurors for cause; (5) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4449 - 2005-03-31
to a jury trial; (4) the trial court erred by not removing two jurors for cause; (5) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4449 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mario V. Whitney
constitutional right to a jury trial; (4) the trial court erred by not removing two jurors for cause; (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4449 - 2017-09-19
constitutional right to a jury trial; (4) the trial court erred by not removing two jurors for cause; (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4449 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Audrey A. Edmunds
bad act, the exclusion of evidence of the child’s parents’ demeanors, a juror excused during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14327 - 2014-09-15
bad act, the exclusion of evidence of the child’s parents’ demeanors, a juror excused during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14327 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of West Allis v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
to the jury; and accepting the verdict because it violates the requirement that five-sixths of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16192 - 2017-09-21
to the jury; and accepting the verdict because it violates the requirement that five-sixths of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16192 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of West Allis v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
to the jury; and accepting the verdict because it violates the requirement that five-sixths of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2602 - 2017-09-19
to the jury; and accepting the verdict because it violates the requirement that five-sixths of the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2602 - 2017-09-19
State v. Johnny L. Thomas
of a prior conviction for sexual assault of a child and the fact that jurors viewed him in shackles while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13192 - 2005-03-31
of a prior conviction for sexual assault of a child and the fact that jurors viewed him in shackles while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James D. Miller
on the ground that one of the jurors had introduced extraneous information into deliberations. Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3137 - 2017-09-19
on the ground that one of the jurors had introduced extraneous information into deliberations. Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3137 - 2017-09-19
State v. James D. Miller
of the jurors had introduced extraneous information into deliberations. Miller’s motion was supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3137 - 2005-03-31
of the jurors had introduced extraneous information into deliberations. Miller’s motion was supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3137 - 2005-03-31