Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8101 - 8110 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 8101 - 8110 of 12912 for prosecuting.
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecution elicited the offending statement from the witness and here the witness was under cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
the prosecution elicited the offending statement from the witness and here the witness was under cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
State v. Matthew D.B.
by the police, or prosecution of the act by the State, have not been authorized by our legislature. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2344 - 2005-03-31
by the police, or prosecution of the act by the State, have not been authorized by our legislature. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
them in for sentencing purposes. The parties also agreed that the State would not prosecute Ford
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209858 - 2018-03-13
them in for sentencing purposes. The parties also agreed that the State would not prosecute Ford
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209858 - 2018-03-13
[PDF]
Kevin M. Jereczek v.
of the proceeding or the board's prosecution of the complaint. No. 96-0795-D 2 Responsibility
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17100 - 2017-09-21
of the proceeding or the board's prosecution of the complaint. No. 96-0795-D 2 Responsibility
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17100 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul M. Nigl
that the prosecution’s speedy trial demand was made in the interest of the victims’ families. It found it was unfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6220 - 2017-09-19
that the prosecution’s speedy trial demand was made in the interest of the victims’ families. It found it was unfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the Sauk County case, he had been serving a probationary term under a deferred prosecution agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13
in the Sauk County case, he had been serving a probationary term under a deferred prosecution agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472272 - 2022-01-13
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Ruiz
the other person does not consent…. “[W]hen the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search by proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21
the other person does not consent…. “[W]hen the prosecution seeks to justify a warrantless search by proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Joseph had abused them, she called the police and cooperated in his prosecution. Chloe stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592618 - 2022-11-22
Joseph had abused them, she called the police and cooperated in his prosecution. Chloe stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592618 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the crime charged in case No. 2006CF4804, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The histories of two prosecutions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90409 - 2014-09-15
with the crime charged in case No. 2006CF4804, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The histories of two prosecutions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90409 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
lineup evidence. Robert was the first witness the prosecution called and testified he could not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01
lineup evidence. Robert was the first witness the prosecution called and testified he could not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01