Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8101 - 8110 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 8101 - 8110 of 18714 for quote.
WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1582-CR Complete Title...
of its meaning.’” Id. (quoting Bruno v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2003 WI 28, ¶20, 260 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96064 - 2013-05-28
of its meaning.’” Id. (quoting Bruno v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2003 WI 28, ¶20, 260 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96064 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 678 N.W.2d 197 (quoting McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 276, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971)). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84332 - 2014-09-15
, 678 N.W.2d 197 (quoting McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 276, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971)). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84332 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 105
.2d 216 (1970) (quoting ABA Standards for Criminal Justice—Pleas of Guilty, § 3.3 (Approved Draft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33171 - 2014-09-15
.2d 216 (1970) (quoting ABA Standards for Criminal Justice—Pleas of Guilty, § 3.3 (Approved Draft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33171 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 488 (quoting State v. Stewart, 2006 WI App 67, ¶11, 291 Wis. 2d 480, 713 N.W.2d 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
N.W.2d 488 (quoting State v. Stewart, 2006 WI App 67, ¶11, 291 Wis. 2d 480, 713 N.W.2d 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
Bersch & Company v. Dairyland Greyhound, Inc.
. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 291–292, 507 N.W.2d 136, 140 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Celotex Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9513 - 2005-03-31
. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 291–292, 507 N.W.2d 136, 140 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Celotex Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9513 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.” Id. (quoting another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.” Id. (quoting another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02
, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02
CA Blank Order
452, 464, 549 N.W.2d 471 (Ct. App. 1996) (quoted source omitted). “A strategic trial decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
452, 464, 549 N.W.2d 471 (Ct. App. 1996) (quoted source omitted). “A strategic trial decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶21 n.7, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶21 n.7, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
.2d at 312, 548 N.W.2d at 54 (quoting Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985)). The standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19
.2d at 312, 548 N.W.2d at 54 (quoting Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985)). The standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19