Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 29995 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 29995 for consulta de causas.
State v. Mark A. Sturm
justifying police to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
justifying police to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph E. Peat
requirements is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Kasian, 207 Wis.2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13141 - 2005-03-31
requirements is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Kasian, 207 Wis.2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13141 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and then review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47930 - 2010-03-16
, and then review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47930 - 2010-03-16
State v. Toby J. Vandenberg
of counsel is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13503 - 2005-03-31
of counsel is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13503 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Egerson
which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13606 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13606 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 397, 398. We review the determination that the undisputed facts establish reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80617 - 2014-09-15
, 397, 398. We review the determination that the undisputed facts establish reasonable suspicion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Calumet v. Andrew I. Turk
of law subject to our de novo review. Id. Here, Tenor articulated two grounds for the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21673 - 2017-09-21
of law subject to our de novo review. Id. Here, Tenor articulated two grounds for the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
East of the River Enterprises II, L.L.C. v. City of Hudson
unconstitutional if it has merely a de minimis or incidental effect. See id. at 1393-94. ¶4 The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16101 - 2017-09-21
unconstitutional if it has merely a de minimis or incidental effect. See id. at 1393-94. ¶4 The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Apollo Travel Services Partnership v. Universal-Heritage Travel
, a “de-install” charge and all unpaid fees up to the day of business cessation would be due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15205 - 2017-09-21
, a “de-install” charge and all unpaid fees up to the day of business cessation would be due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15205 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles R. Lutz v. Washburn County
). The determination whether a party has met his burden of proof is a question of law that we review de novo. Becker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13471 - 2017-09-21
). The determination whether a party has met his burden of proof is a question of law that we review de novo. Becker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13471 - 2017-09-21