Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 57346 for id.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 57346 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not been substantially prejudiced by reliance on the plea. Id. However, “freely” does not mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15
not been substantially prejudiced by reliance on the plea. Id. However, “freely” does not mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges facts that entitle the defendant to relief, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
alleges facts that entitle the defendant to relief, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP62 Complete Title of C...
and unambiguous. Id. Here, “[u]nless the proposed [use] is unambiguously something other than a single family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134011 - 2015-03-24
and unambiguous. Id. Here, “[u]nless the proposed [use] is unambiguously something other than a single family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134011 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
State v. Gilbert H. Butzlaff
exceptions is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 111-12, 490 N.W.2d at 756
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10904 - 2017-09-20
exceptions is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 111-12, 490 N.W.2d at 756
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10904 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for the sentence.” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). If the defendant makes the dual showing, the burden shifts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
for the sentence.” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). If the defendant makes the dual showing, the burden shifts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
State v. Dequelvin M. Douglas
evidence is often applied by this court and need not be repeated here. See id. at 1066-67, 537 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12005 - 2005-03-31
evidence is often applied by this court and need not be repeated here. See id. at 1066-67, 537 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12005 - 2005-03-31
Betty Jo Ramsey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
or her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. See id. Inferences drawn from facts contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14231 - 2005-03-31
or her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. See id. Inferences drawn from facts contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the appeal. Id., ¶20. As Tillman requires, we have conducted an assessment of the no-merit proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
of the appeal. Id., ¶20. As Tillman requires, we have conducted an assessment of the no-merit proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are impermissible because they violate the double jeopardy provisions of the state and federal constitutions.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410383 - 2021-08-17
are impermissible because they violate the double jeopardy provisions of the state and federal constitutions.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410383 - 2021-08-17
State v. Kirk L. Griese
standard of review. Id. This court first reviews the circuit court’s findings of historical fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20532 - 2005-12-06
standard of review. Id. This court first reviews the circuit court’s findings of historical fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20532 - 2005-12-06