Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 12462 for mr.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 12462 for mr.
[PDF]
State v. Michael Mirr
to be received that Mr. Michael Mirr has previously been convicted of a crime, should he choose to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15
to be received that Mr. Michael Mirr has previously been convicted of a crime, should he choose to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
itself said that, “[e]ven assuming Mr. Whitman was intoxicated,” there was no evidence he was driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34626 - 2008-11-18
itself said that, “[e]ven assuming Mr. Whitman was intoxicated,” there was no evidence he was driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34626 - 2008-11-18
State v. Norbert W. Ellis
to Mr. Ellis during his stay in the jail … it certainly wasn’t prejudicial. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
to Mr. Ellis during his stay in the jail … it certainly wasn’t prejudicial. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ belief in reincarnation as a way to explain her “bias against Mr. Troha and his family” after Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84068 - 2014-09-15
’ belief in reincarnation as a way to explain her “bias against Mr. Troha and his family” after Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84068 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
of “the accident, the odor of intoxicants, and Mr. Tesch’s statement” prior to arresting Glaunert and that those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5873 - 2005-03-31
of “the accident, the odor of intoxicants, and Mr. Tesch’s statement” prior to arresting Glaunert and that those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Milton F. Pozo
]: At counter 101 [on the videotape], Mr. Pozo, that is you, is that correct? [Pozo]: Yes. [Prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14022 - 2014-09-15
]: At counter 101 [on the videotape], Mr. Pozo, that is you, is that correct? [Pozo]: Yes. [Prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14022 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court finds the reliability of that result testified to by Mr. Ryan [Pieters] does meet the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145573 - 2017-09-21
that the court finds the reliability of that result testified to by Mr. Ryan [Pieters] does meet the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145573 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concluded its remarks by stating: “These charges are so serious, Mr. Ziedman, that I believe
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
concluded its remarks by stating: “These charges are so serious, Mr. Ziedman, that I believe
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
something to do with a broken furnace, and that Salvatore handled the matter with Mr. Roesler. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
something to do with a broken furnace, and that Salvatore handled the matter with Mr. Roesler. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
State v. Floyd Hopkins
on appeal represents that its office “amended the charge to misdemeanor theft because Mr. Hopkins eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24
on appeal represents that its office “amended the charge to misdemeanor theft because Mr. Hopkins eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24