Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 46040 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 46040 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests. Upon his failure of those tests, Berghuis was arrested on suspicion of operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993056 - 2025-08-06
sobriety tests. Upon his failure of those tests, Berghuis was arrested on suspicion of operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993056 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
frame (despite her assertions to the contrary). The court noted that T.N. had done some of the work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944822 - 2025-04-22
frame (despite her assertions to the contrary). The court noted that T.N. had done some of the work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944822 - 2025-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35883 - 2009-03-16
The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35883 - 2009-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order finding his refusal to submit to chemical testing was unreasonable. Arndt argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144547 - 2017-09-21
an order finding his refusal to submit to chemical testing was unreasonable. Arndt argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144547 - 2017-09-21
State v.
testified that at approximately 9:30 p.m. on the night of August 27, he was working alone in the store
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
testified that at approximately 9:30 p.m. on the night of August 27, he was working alone in the store
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
worked with Benjamin in Steven’s home, stating, “There’s no question that this witness … believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36439 - 2009-05-11
worked with Benjamin in Steven’s home, stating, “There’s no question that this witness … believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36439 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and rescheduling appointments. Stowe was eventually revoked after he entered the bar where Amanda was working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99986 - 2017-09-21
and rescheduling appointments. Stowe was eventually revoked after he entered the bar where Amanda was working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v.
that at approximately 9:30 p.m. on the night of August 27, he was working alone in the store. After hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15514 - 2017-09-21
that at approximately 9:30 p.m. on the night of August 27, he was working alone in the store. After hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The court interjected again during the testimony of a person who worked with Benjamin in Steven’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36439 - 2014-09-15
. The court interjected again during the testimony of a person who worked with Benjamin in Steven’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36439 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stowe was eventually revoked after he entered the bar where Amanda was working, remained for forty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99986 - 2013-07-29
. Stowe was eventually revoked after he entered the bar where Amanda was working, remained for forty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99986 - 2013-07-29