Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 63198 for records.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 63198 for records.
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146197 - 2015-08-18
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146197 - 2015-08-18
State v. Robert P. Eggimann
On the question of prejudice, Eggimann claims the record shows that the State failed to demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
On the question of prejudice, Eggimann claims the record shows that the State failed to demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2381 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845506 - 2024-09-04
not responded. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845506 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155957 - 2017-09-21
2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155957 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ralph E. Harris
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8813 - 2005-03-31
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
record. That record included findings of deliberate exhibitionism by masturbating in front of staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130674 - 2017-09-21
record. That record included findings of deliberate exhibitionism by masturbating in front of staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130674 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
parole consideration from 12 months to 36 months. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191478 - 2017-09-21
parole consideration from 12 months to 36 months. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208107 - 2018-02-07
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208107 - 2018-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. An addendum to Schmitt’s four prior reports, the report updated Ziegler’s institutional behavioral records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102022 - 2017-09-21
. An addendum to Schmitt’s four prior reports, the report updated Ziegler’s institutional behavioral records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102022 - 2017-09-21