Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 41447 for she.
Search results 8111 - 8120 of 41447 for she.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
informed the court that he had spoken to Josephine that morning and she had told him she was ill, needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140605 - 2017-09-21
informed the court that he had spoken to Josephine that morning and she had told him she was ill, needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140605 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mae Neugart v. Lori Bell
misled the circuit court. She contends that we raised and disposed of an issue that the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20562 - 2017-09-21
misled the circuit court. She contends that we raised and disposed of an issue that the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20562 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Justice Janet C. Protasiewicz
Court, Justice Protasiewicz served as a Circuit Court Judge in Milwaukee County. She was first elected
/courts/supreme/justices/protasiewicz.htm - 2026-01-01
Court, Justice Protasiewicz served as a Circuit Court Judge in Milwaukee County. She was first elected
/courts/supreme/justices/protasiewicz.htm - 2026-01-01
State v. Delynn A. Streit
Eventually Streit pled no contest to the OWI charge.[3] However, she challenged both of the repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2674 - 2005-03-31
Eventually Streit pled no contest to the OWI charge.[3] However, she challenged both of the repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2674 - 2005-03-31
Mae Neugart v. Lori Bell
that our prior opinion misled the circuit court. She contends that we raised and disposed of an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20562 - 2005-12-07
that our prior opinion misled the circuit court. She contends that we raised and disposed of an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20562 - 2005-12-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
employment was sporadic. She testified at the contested divorce hearing that Charles was “always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98830 - 2014-09-15
employment was sporadic. She testified at the contested divorce hearing that Charles was “always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98830 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 21
. The question in this case is whether an expert witness violated the Haseltine rule when she testified
/supreme/docs/21ap1346.pdf - 2025-06-13
. The question in this case is whether an expert witness violated the Haseltine rule when she testified
/supreme/docs/21ap1346.pdf - 2025-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2021AP1501 3 hug.” Instead, Hudson “gave [Schneider] a disgusted look and refused, stated she would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535327 - 2022-06-22
. No. 2021AP1501 3 hug.” Instead, Hudson “gave [Schneider] a disgusted look and refused, stated she would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535327 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, C.R.K., 2 E.K., and K.K. 3 She raises several arguments involving the grounds phase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188270 - 2017-09-21
, C.R.K., 2 E.K., and K.K. 3 She raises several arguments involving the grounds phase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 21
. The question in this case is whether an expert witness violated the Haseltine rule when she testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970368 - 2025-06-16
. The question in this case is whether an expert witness violated the Haseltine rule when she testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970368 - 2025-06-16