Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 81181 - 81190 of 82986 for simple case.
Search results 81181 - 81190 of 82986 for simple case.
[PDF]
Disposition table for September & October 2007
2007 WI 134 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT DECIDED September 1
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31027 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI 134 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT DECIDED September 1
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31027 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242086 - 2019-06-19
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242086 - 2019-06-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case. The prosecutor recommended the maximum available reconfinement period, which the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
in this case. The prosecutor recommended the maximum available reconfinement period, which the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
State v. James E. Gray
, and statements, if any, and from all of the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent. As a part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3785 - 2005-03-31
, and statements, if any, and from all of the facts and circumstances in this case bearing upon intent. As a part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
effectiveness, which includes counsel’s testimony to explain [counsel’s] handling of the case.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1128360 - 2026-06-11
effectiveness, which includes counsel’s testimony to explain [counsel’s] handling of the case.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1128360 - 2026-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
and given that the maximum penalty in this case was fifteen years in prison[, the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28408 - 2007-03-12
and given that the maximum penalty in this case was fifteen years in prison[, the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28408 - 2007-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case does not support the circuit court’s findings. We disagree. ¶11 The circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
in this case does not support the circuit court’s findings. We disagree. ¶11 The circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Janice Howe v. Ronald Howe
.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶20 In this case, Ronald’s entire appeal is frivolous because he provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4328 - 2017-09-19
.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶20 In this case, Ronald’s entire appeal is frivolous because he provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4328 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is 1 Because the parties have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842786 - 2024-08-28
, we conclude at conference that this case is 1 Because the parties have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842786 - 2024-08-28
Town of Liberty Grove v. Charles Voight
. While this court has already determined that the ferry activity in this case constitutes interstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13982 - 2005-03-31
. While this court has already determined that the ferry activity in this case constitutes interstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13982 - 2005-03-31