Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8121 - 8130 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8121 - 8130 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
Thomas W. Nelson v. John L. McLaughlin
, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 807.01(4). ¶8 In its motions after verdict, Mutual Service argued
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17072 - 2005-03-31
, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 807.01(4). ¶8 In its motions after verdict, Mutual Service argued
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17072 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dirk E. Harris
-0730-CR 5 and that people were in custody in Milwaukee in relation to the crime. Blazer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16857 - 2017-09-21
-0730-CR 5 and that people were in custody in Milwaukee in relation to the crime. Blazer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Supplemental Appendix of Petitioners
5Plaintiff-movant admits that the Motion and the Baldus action are part of a joint strategy and that either
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030suppappendixpet.pdf - 2023-10-30
5Plaintiff-movant admits that the Motion and the Baldus action are part of a joint strategy and that either
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030suppappendixpet.pdf - 2023-10-30
State v. Michael A. Turner
into custody in the vicinity of the homes. Turner had been observed throwing something as officers approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15749 - 2005-03-31
into custody in the vicinity of the homes. Turner had been observed throwing something as officers approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15749 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court denied Donald’s motion notwithstanding the verdict, held a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77429 - 2012-01-31
. The trial court denied Donald’s motion notwithstanding the verdict, held a dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77429 - 2012-01-31
State v. Gustavo Espino
) in denying his motion to suppress his statements to the police; (2) in dismissing a prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
) in denying his motion to suppress his statements to the police; (2) in dismissing a prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12575 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jordan argues he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42082 - 2009-10-13
offense, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jordan argues he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42082 - 2009-10-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Socha initially was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132818 - 2017-09-21
his motion for postconviction relief. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Socha initially was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132818 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
).[1] He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132818 - 2015-01-12
).[1] He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132818 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
State v. Kevin O'Hare
entry into the apartment to return the child pursuant to a shared custody arrangement. But O'Hare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10107 - 2017-09-19
entry into the apartment to return the child pursuant to a shared custody arrangement. But O'Hare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10107 - 2017-09-19