Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8121 - 8130 of 69007 for had.
Search results 8121 - 8130 of 69007 for had.
State v. Randall R. Rosenbaum
that they believed Rosenbaum had been drinking. About thirty minutes or so after the accident, Hanson went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13939 - 2005-03-31
that they believed Rosenbaum had been drinking. About thirty minutes or so after the accident, Hanson went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion arguing that his trial attorney had been ineffective for not arguing that Skamfer’s mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161748 - 2017-09-21
a motion arguing that his trial attorney had been ineffective for not arguing that Skamfer’s mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Bruce A. Rumage v. Gary A. McCaughtry
the case because Rumage had failed to comply with the notice of claim statute, § 893.82(3), STATS., had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21
the case because Rumage had failed to comply with the notice of claim statute, § 893.82(3), STATS., had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, although he did not specifically recall whether he had done that here. In contrast, Henry testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05
, although he did not specifically recall whether he had done that here. In contrast, Henry testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100358 - 2013-08-05
State v. Kirk Ennenga
that the sentencing judge had any personal interest in the matter, and affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-03-31
that the sentencing judge had any personal interest in the matter, and affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-03-31
Arthur & Owens v. Michael A. Doucas
Arthur had concluded that Doucas would not receive an acceptable settlement offer. Doucas refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9487 - 2005-03-31
Arthur had concluded that Doucas would not receive an acceptable settlement offer. Doucas refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9487 - 2005-03-31
Donald Brzezinski v. Waukesha County
and that the County thereby had a legal obligation to retroactively pay social security tax and employee benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9846 - 2005-03-31
and that the County thereby had a legal obligation to retroactively pay social security tax and employee benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
learned that Kain had a revoked license. 2 Mulroy conducted a traffic stop and noted an “odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221939 - 2018-10-17
learned that Kain had a revoked license. 2 Mulroy conducted a traffic stop and noted an “odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221939 - 2018-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
to the search and their consent was not voluntary. We conclude Deane’s parents had actual authority to consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54641 - 2010-09-20
to the search and their consent was not voluntary. We conclude Deane’s parents had actual authority to consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54641 - 2010-09-20
State v. Randall D. Peterson
court’s order denying his motion to suppress statements he made to a police officer who had stopped to aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4940 - 2005-03-31
court’s order denying his motion to suppress statements he made to a police officer who had stopped to aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4940 - 2005-03-31