Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8121 - 8130 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] Colleen Seefeldt v. Darold Seefeldt
be determined on a case-by-case basis. Id. at 96, 388 N.W.2d at 551. The trial court must be mindful of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11901 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert E. Zastrow
they are clearly erroneous. See id. “However, the ultimate determination of whether the attorney’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15424 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
and founded on proper legal standards. See id. at 518, 444 N.W.2d at 460-61. ¶14 On appeal, James contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13692 - 2014-09-15

City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
that of statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the enacting body." Id. We first examine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17484 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kirk L. Griese
fact to which this court applies a two-step standard of review. Id. This court first reviews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20532 - 2017-09-21

Russell S. Borst v. Allstate Insurance Company
with the parties. Id. at 550-51. Observing that the two party-selected arbitrators “by design” effectively were
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20366 - 2005-11-22

Chavis J. Sheriff v. Edwardo G. Arellano, M.D.
counsel. Id. at 450, 534 N.W.2d at 364. The attorney was not present for the meeting where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7869 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the appeal. Id., ¶20. As Tillman requires, we have conducted an assessment of the no-merit proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that Voeller entered a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. See id. “Two legal paths are available
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02

[PDF] Bill's Distributing, Ltd. v. Gerald Cormican
(1999). The purpose of statutory interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4413 - 2017-09-19