Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8131 - 8140 of 13662 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.

COURT OF APPEALS
sentences violate the principles of multiplicity and double jeopardy. A claim of multiplicity at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14

State v. Ricky L. Schumacher
charging is impermissible because it violates the double jeopardy provision of the Wisconsin and United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9869 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an informant’s double-hearsay statement accusing Jones as the leader of the robbery and murders.” Id. at 1035
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204737 - 2017-12-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to be free from double jeopardy by reconsidering his expungement eligibility. Because the forfeiture issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422652 - 2021-09-08

[PDF] Micro Colorgraphics, Inc. v. Robert and Nancy Unger
. In some situations, allowing a party to prosecute both would enable it to obtain a double recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8313 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to recover double costs if the defendant rejects the plaintiff’s settlement offer and the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88870 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Ricky L. Schumacher
N.W.2d 874 (1994). "Multiplicitous charging is impermissible because it violates the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9869 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
insurance companies from receiving a double deduction on that portion of its loss reserves which is funded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10173 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an impermissible double recovery for C.B. ¶24 The central problem for Smith is that he cannot carry his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219446 - 2018-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
. “Impeaching a child witness with a prior inconsistent statement is a double-edged sword—it may cast doubt upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45233 - 2010-01-05