Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8131 - 8140 of 63904 for records.
Search results 8131 - 8140 of 63904 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150853 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198100 - 2017-10-25
and postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198100 - 2017-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845506 - 2024-09-04
not responded. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845506 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion by predetermining his sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569114 - 2022-09-22
sentencing discretion by predetermining his sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569114 - 2022-09-22
State v. Ralph E. Harris
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8813 - 2005-03-31
not filed a response. Based on our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of Vander Heiden’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578131 - 2022-10-18
our review of Vander Heiden’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578131 - 2022-10-18
State v. Hans Gerger
that the State had not breached the plea agreement. Our review of the record supports this finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13995 - 2005-03-31
that the State had not breached the plea agreement. Our review of the record supports this finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the records, the no-merit report, and Kaitlynn’s response, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041524 - 2025-11-25
an independent review of the records, the no-merit report, and Kaitlynn’s response, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041524 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. An addendum to Schmitt’s four prior reports, the report updated Ziegler’s institutional behavioral records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102022 - 2017-09-21
. An addendum to Schmitt’s four prior reports, the report updated Ziegler’s institutional behavioral records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102022 - 2017-09-21