Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8131 - 8140 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".

[PDF] NOTICE
. Kruschke, 115 Wis. 2d 124, 127, 339 N.W.2d 603 (Ct. App. 1983) (“Expert opinions can be based on facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61328 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. App. 1983). We note that the sentences McClain received were well within the maximum the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246832 - 2019-09-13

Darren M. Mueller v. Sgt. Reamer
. The court noted that, under bin-Rilla v. Israel, 113 Wis. 2d 514, 520, 335 N.W.2d 384 (1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15968 - 2005-03-31

City of Baraboo v. Gary G. Ranum
583, 587, 334 N.W.2d 246 (1983). We affirm a trial court’s discretionary decision if the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4040 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 227, 236, 341 N.W.2d 716 (Ct. App. 1983), aff’d, 119 Wis. 2d 788, 350 N.W.2d 686 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52009 - 2010-07-12

Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
. 2d 389, 401, 335 N.W.2d 814 (1983). Whether a search and seizure of evidence is lawful, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5599 - 2005-03-31

Gary Rowland v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
. DILHR, 111 Wis.2d 46, 54, 330 N.W.2d 169, 173 (1983). The application of hearsay rules to undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sherman Williams
, 340 N.W.2d 498, 503 (1983). Under this standard, we must affirm the trial court if it applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kathleen Wagner
. Hegwood, 113 Wis.2d 544, 547, 335 N.W.2d 399, 401 (1983). “Sentence modification involves a two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14868 - 2017-09-21

State v. Quentin D.
(1983). Stated another way, a frisk is lawful when “a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15450 - 2005-03-31