Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8141 - 8150 of 30662 for WA 0821 1305 0400 Penyedia XRF Gun To Test Gold Murah Kerinci Jambi [[Tigapillar]].

State v. Heidi L. Williams
-alcohol test administered after her arrest, arguing that the police lacked probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4120 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Paul M. Nigl
for postconviction relief. He argues that blood test results should have been suppressed, that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6220 - 2017-09-19

State v. Donald E. Biesecker
a chemical test of his blood in violation of Wisconsin's implied consent law, § 343.305, Stats. Biesecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11468 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
suspicion to extend the traffic stop to conduct field sobriety tests, and therefore he argues the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593434 - 2022-11-23

COURT OF APPEALS
his motion to suppress the initial stop and the imposition of field sobriety tests. The issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63016 - 2011-04-26

[PDF] NOTICE
court’s order denying his motion to suppress the initial stop and the imposition of field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63016 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Prokopios G. Vassos
by the constitutional same-elements test set forth in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17239 - 2017-09-21

State v. Prokopios G. Vassos
is not barred by the constitutional same-elements test set forth in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17239 - 2005-03-31

09AP5 State v. Jill Y. Treleven.doc
is a common sense test.” State v. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25, ¶8, 260 Wis. 2d 406, 659 N.W.2d 394. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30

[PDF] NOTICE
constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test.” State v. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25, ¶8, 260 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36906 - 2014-09-15