Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8141 - 8150 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 8141 - 8150 of 16451 for commenting.
Certification
. The circuit court commented on the problem with the four-corners rule in self-defense situations—the facts
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55367 - 2010-10-12
. The circuit court commented on the problem with the four-corners rule in self-defense situations—the facts
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55367 - 2010-10-12
State v. Mary F.-R.
commented on the credibility of witnesses. This activity, while not testimony as such, occurred in front
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
commented on the credibility of witnesses. This activity, while not testimony as such, occurred in front
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Yelk
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11850 - 2005-03-31
and commented on their collective seriousness and their impact on Yelk’s victims. It considered the character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11850 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
on the victim.” The circuit court’s comments demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion. On the count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126935 - 2014-11-05
on the victim.” The circuit court’s comments demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion. On the count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126935 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
any comments by the judge that would indicate deep- seated favoritism or antagonism. Rahder asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250048 - 2019-11-14
any comments by the judge that would indicate deep- seated favoritism or antagonism. Rahder asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250048 - 2019-11-14
Graham L. Smith v. Pamela Mae Smith
not impute any actual amount of income to Pam’s painting, we see no harm in its comments that Pam might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
not impute any actual amount of income to Pam’s painting, we see no harm in its comments that Pam might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
comments satisfy this standard. ¶10 During the sentencing hearing, the court questioned Marker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
comments satisfy this standard. ¶10 During the sentencing hearing, the court questioned Marker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
State v. Correy Robertson
that the questions may have elicited testimony implicitly commenting on the credibility of another witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4560 - 2005-03-31
that the questions may have elicited testimony implicitly commenting on the credibility of another witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4560 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
further explained that it “was not obliged to comment on each and every mitigating factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
further explained that it “was not obliged to comment on each and every mitigating factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
State v. Victoria D. Roesing
that Roesing was read her Miranda rights by the arresting officer. The defense objected to this comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
that Roesing was read her Miranda rights by the arresting officer. The defense objected to this comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31