Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8141 - 8150 of 17526 for ex.
Search results 8141 - 8150 of 17526 for ex.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but sentenced after that date and before April 1, 2015, is an unconstitutional ex post facto punishment. 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143918 - 2017-09-21
, but sentenced after that date and before April 1, 2015, is an unconstitutional ex post facto punishment. 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143918 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James A. Smith
his right to appellate counsel. See State ex rel. Smith v. Berge, No. 03-0808-W, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26318 - 2017-09-21
his right to appellate counsel. See State ex rel. Smith v. Berge, No. 03-0808-W, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Nancy’s appraisal, an amount much lower than the appraisal submitted by her ex-husband. At the remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38938 - 2014-09-15
on Nancy’s appraisal, an amount much lower than the appraisal submitted by her ex-husband. At the remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38938 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an appellant challenge the validity of any probation revocation decision in this proceeding. See State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
an appellant challenge the validity of any probation revocation decision in this proceeding. See State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an appellant challenge the validity of any probation revocation decision in this proceeding. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
an appellant challenge the validity of any probation revocation decision in this proceeding. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
treatment. See State ex rel. Gendrich v. Litscher, 2001 WI App 163, ¶10, 246 Wis. 2d 814, 632 N.W.2d 878
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60994 - 2011-03-14
treatment. See State ex rel. Gendrich v. Litscher, 2001 WI App 163, ¶10, 246 Wis. 2d 814, 632 N.W.2d 878
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60994 - 2011-03-14
CA Blank Order
Gullickson filed a motion seeking sole custody and placement of the ex-couple’s two youngest children, A.B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108053 - 2014-02-12
Gullickson filed a motion seeking sole custody and placement of the ex-couple’s two youngest children, A.B
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108053 - 2014-02-12
State v. Auston J.S.
absurd or unreasonable results.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004 WI 58, ¶46, 271 Wis. 2d 633
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7665 - 2005-03-31
absurd or unreasonable results.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004 WI 58, ¶46, 271 Wis. 2d 633
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ellen Wall Payne v. Phillip Charles Brande
physical placement of Michael. On December 31, 1996, Brande obtained a North Carolina temporary ex parte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13947 - 2014-09-15
physical placement of Michael. On December 31, 1996, Brande obtained a North Carolina temporary ex parte
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal was not. State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681-82, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68656 - 2014-09-15
appeal was not. State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 681-82, 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68656 - 2014-09-15