Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8141 - 8150 of 12423 for mr.
Search results 8141 - 8150 of 12423 for mr.
State v. Floyd Hopkins
on appeal represents that its office “amended the charge to misdemeanor theft because Mr. Hopkins eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24
on appeal represents that its office “amended the charge to misdemeanor theft because Mr. Hopkins eventually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 At sentencing, the State had commented: Mr. Diaz was an innocent person. He had nothing to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104443 - 2017-09-21
. ¶5 At sentencing, the State had commented: Mr. Diaz was an innocent person. He had nothing to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
placement granting primary placement to dad, Mr. Warner, is in the girls’ best interest. That removal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
placement granting primary placement to dad, Mr. Warner, is in the girls’ best interest. That removal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
of the children; they had custody over the children during the time in which Mr. Pagels’ car was vandalized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
of the children; they had custody over the children during the time in which Mr. Pagels’ car was vandalized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
Carmella A. Marino v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation
to the ground, injuring Mrs. Novak. The Novaks sued under the safe-place statute. Novak, 31 Wis. 2d at 202-03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17801 - 2005-05-02
to the ground, injuring Mrs. Novak. The Novaks sued under the safe-place statute. Novak, 31 Wis. 2d at 202-03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17801 - 2005-05-02
State v. Jimmy Thomas
argues that the court erred in concluding that he is "equally guilty with Mr. Fox." Finally, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
argues that the court erred in concluding that he is "equally guilty with Mr. Fox." Finally, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
stated: These two parents have, from this court’s perspective, been very selfish – Mr. M used the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6155 - 2005-03-31
stated: These two parents have, from this court’s perspective, been very selfish – Mr. M used the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the contractor. ¶11 The court summed up its ruling as follows: Mr. Nichols, … you made a contract to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318118 - 2020-12-23
the contractor. ¶11 The court summed up its ruling as follows: Mr. Nichols, … you made a contract to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318118 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the elements, including the definition of utter disregard with Mr. Jackson.” The court found that Jackson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542879 - 2022-07-13
of the elements, including the definition of utter disregard with Mr. Jackson.” The court found that Jackson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542879 - 2022-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
liability for overpaid commissions] by Jim Pettit [an American employee]? ANSWER: YES Question 3: Was Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30038 - 2007-08-21
liability for overpaid commissions] by Jim Pettit [an American employee]? ANSWER: YES Question 3: Was Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30038 - 2007-08-21