Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 57912 for a i x.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 57912 for a i x.
COURT OF APPEALS
. I believe she knew that the box cutter was in the purse but she did not think that that was an item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42880 - 2009-11-03
. I believe she knew that the box cutter was in the purse but she did not think that that was an item
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42880 - 2009-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
without good cause being shown and in violation of T.F.W.’s right to due process. I reject T.F.W.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191395 - 2017-09-21
without good cause being shown and in violation of T.F.W.’s right to due process. I reject T.F.W.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
morning, the circuit court made a further record: THE COURT: Good enough. One other thing, I think
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
morning, the circuit court made a further record: THE COURT: Good enough. One other thing, I think
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
back where I don’t think about killing myself.” He also said he was “not in the right state of mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181878 - 2017-09-21
back where I don’t think about killing myself.” He also said he was “not in the right state of mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181878 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
what this means, the repeater enhancer? THE DEFENDANT: I don’t just because I don’t understand why
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144544 - 2015-07-13
what this means, the repeater enhancer? THE DEFENDANT: I don’t just because I don’t understand why
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144544 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Guzman
, explaining its decision as follows: I am going to deny that testimony coming in. I will state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9749 - 2017-09-19
, explaining its decision as follows: I am going to deny that testimony coming in. I will state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9749 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas Guzman
and rejected the prosecution's offer of proof, explaining its decision as follows: I am going to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9749 - 2005-03-31
and rejected the prosecution's offer of proof, explaining its decision as follows: I am going to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9749 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Mente
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18856 - 2017-09-21
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18856 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in ordering restitution. Nieman renews his argument on that issue on appeal. As I explain, Nieman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249763 - 2019-11-07
in ordering restitution. Nieman renews his argument on that issue on appeal. As I explain, Nieman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249763 - 2019-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration in which he alleges that one of the witnesses at trial perjured himself. Because I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242480 - 2019-06-20
for reconsideration in which he alleges that one of the witnesses at trial perjured himself. Because I conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242480 - 2019-06-20