Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 34225 for dismissal.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 34225 for dismissal.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment in DPI’s favor, dismissing all of the Academy’s claims against DPI. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246412 - 2019-09-10
judgment in DPI’s favor, dismissing all of the Academy’s claims against DPI. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246412 - 2019-09-10
State v. Chad A. Pritchard
. At the close of the prosecution’s case, Pritchard moved for dismissal on the grounds that the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2373 - 2005-03-31
. At the close of the prosecution’s case, Pritchard moved for dismissal on the grounds that the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance on the HGN test. ¶6 Five days before Batterman’s jury trial, the State moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732306 - 2023-11-28
performance on the HGN test. ¶6 Five days before Batterman’s jury trial, the State moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732306 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court denied Seeber’s motion to dismiss the action and, after a trial, found him to be in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
court denied Seeber’s motion to dismiss the action and, after a trial, found him to be in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
[PDF]
State v. David D. Masini
that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13181 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13181 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lester Young
was ineffective for failing to: (1) move for dismissal of the charge at the close of the State’s case on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective for failing to: (1) move for dismissal of the charge at the close of the State’s case on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31
Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
. Honeycrest Farms, Inc., appeals a judgment dismissing its action against Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9292 - 2005-03-31
. Honeycrest Farms, Inc., appeals a judgment dismissing its action against Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9292 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2003-04) (procedure for seeking interlocutory review). This court dismissed the petition because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29133 - 2014-09-15
(2003-04) (procedure for seeking interlocutory review). This court dismissed the petition because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29133 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William A. Pangman v. Shawano County
of existing law. 2 Pangman does not appeal the portion of the judgment dismissing the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
of existing law. 2 Pangman does not appeal the portion of the judgment dismissing the plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dennis P. Smith
, that the time period between the dismissal of prior charges relating to a given offense and the re-filing of new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
, that the time period between the dismissal of prior charges relating to a given offense and the re-filing of new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24