Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 17643 for ex.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 17643 for ex.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92146 - 2013-01-28
postconviction motion pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92146 - 2013-01-28
State v. Leng Xiong
in his direct appeal. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 556 N.W.2d 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21749 - 2006-03-13
in his direct appeal. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 556 N.W.2d 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21749 - 2006-03-13
Annette Petrowsky v. Brad Krause
ex rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court, 214 Wis.2d 604, 613, 571 N.W.2d 385, 387 (1997). The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12815 - 2005-03-31
ex rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court, 214 Wis.2d 604, 613, 571 N.W.2d 385, 387 (1997). The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12815 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul R. Benzel
(Or. 1928); see also State v. Williams, 61 S.E. 61 (N.C. 1908); Ex parte Hollman, 60 S.E. 19 (S.C. 1908
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13346 - 2005-03-31
(Or. 1928); see also State v. Williams, 61 S.E. 61 (N.C. 1908); Ex parte Hollman, 60 S.E. 19 (S.C. 1908
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a respondent to file a brief is grounds for summary reversal. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2); State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460605 - 2021-12-09
of a respondent to file a brief is grounds for summary reversal. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83(2); State ex rel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460605 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
litigants the best argument they could have, but did not, make.” State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson, 2019
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984108 - 2025-07-22
litigants the best argument they could have, but did not, make.” State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson, 2019
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984108 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), State ex rel. Rilla v. Circuit Court, 76 Wis. 2d 429, 434, 251 N.W.2d 476 (1977), and WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117052 - 2017-09-21
), State ex rel. Rilla v. Circuit Court, 76 Wis. 2d 429, 434, 251 N.W.2d 476 (1977), and WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117052 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
Health Ins. Risk-Sharing Plan 06-19-2014 Affirmed 2013AP000934 State ex rel. Juan Antonio Rodriguez v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119327 - 2014-09-15
Health Ins. Risk-Sharing Plan 06-19-2014 Affirmed 2013AP000934 State ex rel. Juan Antonio Rodriguez v
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119327 - 2014-09-15
09AP574 State v. Gerald A. LaDue.doc
whether concurrent or consecutive in the state prisons. ¶12 Further, in State ex rel. Darby v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38058 - 2009-07-21
whether concurrent or consecutive in the state prisons. ¶12 Further, in State ex rel. Darby v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38058 - 2009-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Citing Stone v. Morris, 546 F.2d 730 (7th Cir. 1995), State ex rel. Rilla v. Circuit Court, 76 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117052 - 2014-07-14
Citing Stone v. Morris, 546 F.2d 730 (7th Cir. 1995), State ex rel. Rilla v. Circuit Court, 76 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117052 - 2014-07-14