Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 17242 for probate/1000.
State v. Steven J. Arthur
, at a minimum he will be under probation supervision until October, 2018 when he will be 64 years of age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4528 - 2005-03-31
, at a minimum he will be under probation supervision until October, 2018 when he will be 64 years of age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or three years’ probation, No. 2023AP1285-CRNM 3 consecutive to the prison sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22
or three years’ probation, No. 2023AP1285-CRNM 3 consecutive to the prison sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Heather R. Iverson Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Brian Sheffler Register in Probate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027567 - 2025-10-22
. Heather R. Iverson Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Brian Sheffler Register in Probate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027567 - 2025-10-22
State v. Scott E. Laituri
of movable property. His sentence was stayed and he was placed on ten years’ probation, consecutive to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7041 - 2005-03-31
of movable property. His sentence was stayed and he was placed on ten years’ probation, consecutive to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
and Allen Scott and Leila Bailie (collectively, “the Scotts”) appeal from an order admitting into probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21
and Allen Scott and Leila Bailie (collectively, “the Scotts”) appeal from an order admitting into probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
believed that probation was unavailable to him. The trial court denied the motion after an evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132247 - 2017-09-21
believed that probation was unavailable to him. The trial court denied the motion after an evidentiary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132247 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of probation with sixty days in jail as a condition of probation, a mandatory penalty, in addition to a fine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142791 - 2017-09-21
of probation with sixty days in jail as a condition of probation, a mandatory penalty, in addition to a fine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rights accorded citizens.” State ex rel. Ludtke v. Department of Corr., Div. of Probation & Parole
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102236 - 2017-09-21
rights accorded citizens.” State ex rel. Ludtke v. Department of Corr., Div. of Probation & Parole
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102236 - 2017-09-21
Dianne Boyd v. Cora Coleman
with the probate court seeking that Coleman be appointed special administrator for the administration of Willie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15347 - 2005-03-31
with the probate court seeking that Coleman be appointed special administrator for the administration of Willie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15347 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that newly discovered evidence entitles a probation revokee to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102207 - 2013-09-23
that newly discovered evidence entitles a probation revokee to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102207 - 2013-09-23