Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 18714 for quote.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶21 n.7, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶21 n.7, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
190 (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted), a court commissioner’s powers and duties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=991682 - 2025-08-07
190 (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted), a court commissioner’s powers and duties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=991682 - 2025-08-07
CA Blank Order
.’” See State v. Grindemann, 2002 WI App 106, ¶¶31-32, 255 Wis. 2d 632, 648 N.W.2d 507 (quoted sources
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132842 - 2015-01-08
.’” See State v. Grindemann, 2002 WI App 106, ¶¶31-32, 255 Wis. 2d 632, 648 N.W.2d 507 (quoted sources
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132842 - 2015-01-08
CA Blank Order
quotation marks and quoted sources omitted). Upon our independent review of the record, we have found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102015 - 2013-09-12
quotation marks and quoted sources omitted). Upon our independent review of the record, we have found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102015 - 2013-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, 172 Wis. 2d at 134 (quoting LaRocque, 139 Wis. 2d at 36) (emphasis omitted). Bonuses, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104186 - 2013-11-12
, 172 Wis. 2d at 134 (quoting LaRocque, 139 Wis. 2d at 36) (emphasis omitted). Bonuses, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104186 - 2013-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.” Id. (quoting another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
, then there is no ambiguity, and the statute is applied according to this ascertainment of its meaning.” Id. (quoting another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of the stop.” Id., ¶10 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The intrusion is warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78740 - 2012-02-28
of the stop.” Id., ¶10 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968)). The intrusion is warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78740 - 2012-02-28
State v. Jamal Purifoy
. 1994) (emphasis added; quoting Broadie v. State, 68 Wis.2d 420, 423, 228 N.W.2d 687, 689 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31
. 1994) (emphasis added; quoting Broadie v. State, 68 Wis.2d 420, 423, 228 N.W.2d 687, 689 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Norman v. Ruby Faulkner
utilize a “‘speeded up’” forum. See Scalzo, 87 Wis.2d at 847, 275 N.W.2d at 899 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
utilize a “‘speeded up’” forum. See Scalzo, 87 Wis.2d at 847, 275 N.W.2d at 899 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “a corporation could bring because the corporation’s assets are affected.” Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121816 - 2014-09-16
that “a corporation could bring because the corporation’s assets are affected.” Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121816 - 2014-09-16