Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 12871 for se.
Search results 8151 - 8160 of 12871 for se.
State v. James Gulley
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Gulley, acting pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3793 - 2005-03-31
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Gulley, acting pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3793 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
properly denied postconviction counsel’s motion to withdraw so that Rowe could proceed pro se on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823112 - 2024-07-09
properly denied postconviction counsel’s motion to withdraw so that Rowe could proceed pro se on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823112 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the child. At the February hearing, Wurtzinger and Cutts appeared pro se. Peter’s Guardian ad Litem
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590167 - 2022-11-16
with the child. At the February hearing, Wurtzinger and Cutts appeared pro se. Peter’s Guardian ad Litem
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590167 - 2022-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. IV; Wis. Const. art. I § 11. Warrantless searches are considered per se unreasonable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212979 - 2018-05-17
. IV; Wis. Const. art. I § 11. Warrantless searches are considered per se unreasonable under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212979 - 2018-05-17
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
Gulley, acting pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
Gulley, acting pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Kloppenburg, P.J., Higginbotham and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J. Walter Witten, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185884 - 2017-09-21
Kloppenburg, P.J., Higginbotham and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J. Walter Witten, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185884 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kyle Cornelius appeals pro se from the circuit court’s denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27843 - 2007-01-22
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kyle Cornelius appeals pro se from the circuit court’s denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27843 - 2007-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to withdraw on April 6, 2024. Six days later Hill filed, pro se, motions to discharge his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
a motion to withdraw on April 6, 2024. Six days later Hill filed, pro se, motions to discharge his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
State v. Mark R. Petersen
, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark R. Petersen appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3897 - 2005-03-31
, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark R. Petersen appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3897 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. B. Davis Investment, LLC
. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.[1] Brian E. Davis, pro se, on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.[1] Brian E. Davis, pro se, on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31