Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 81511 - 81520 of 82545 for simple case.
Search results 81511 - 81520 of 82545 for simple case.
[PDF]
State v. Crystal C. Parker
, in exercising its sentencing discretion, giving maximum sentences—consecutive sentences in this case … had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5471 - 2017-09-19
, in exercising its sentencing discretion, giving maximum sentences—consecutive sentences in this case … had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5471 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
). In this case, the circuit court made its findings of fact pursuant to the following standards: b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88329 - 2012-10-17
). In this case, the circuit court made its findings of fact pursuant to the following standards: b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88329 - 2012-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
that medical witness must testify as to “her own conduct relevant to the case, including her observations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34198 - 2008-10-01
that medical witness must testify as to “her own conduct relevant to the case, including her observations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34198 - 2008-10-01
Boulanger Construction Co., Inc. v. United Fire and Casualty Company
directly against Hobart. ¶9 The case was tried to the court over portions of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6971 - 2005-03-31
directly against Hobart. ¶9 The case was tried to the court over portions of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6971 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
over a case involving the litigant.” Miller v. Carroll, 2019 WI App 10, ¶24, 386 Wis. 2d 267, 925
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961381 - 2025-05-28
over a case involving the litigant.” Miller v. Carroll, 2019 WI App 10, ¶24, 386 Wis. 2d 267, 925
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961381 - 2025-05-28
State v. Kristen K. Cleaver
)5. [1] Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). [2] We previously remanded this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20061 - 2005-10-25
)5. [1] Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). [2] We previously remanded this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20061 - 2005-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Myers
. In any case, on the facts as found by the trial court, Schauf did remain available but Myers never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9006 - 2017-09-19
. In any case, on the facts as found by the trial court, Schauf did remain available but Myers never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9006 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court’s discretion. Id. ¶19 In this case, the circuit court ordered Patrick to pay Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303255 - 2020-11-10
to the circuit court’s discretion. Id. ¶19 In this case, the circuit court ordered Patrick to pay Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303255 - 2020-11-10
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Eckstein
, and impeachment of her testimony would likely have affected the outcome of the case. ¶15 We will not second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5713 - 2017-09-19
, and impeachment of her testimony would likely have affected the outcome of the case. ¶15 We will not second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5713 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Liggins
leading to the charges in this case occurred on May 13, 1998. The victim, Dorothy S., invited Liggins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2223 - 2017-09-19
leading to the charges in this case occurred on May 13, 1998. The victim, Dorothy S., invited Liggins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2223 - 2017-09-19